Off The Record

Off The Record

Share this post

Off The Record
Off The Record
Sanctionable conduct
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Sanctionable conduct

Some unspoken truths about the legal profession revealed by that ChatGPT case

Alex Su's avatar
Alex Su
Jun 26, 2023
∙ Paid
6

Share this post

Off The Record
Off The Record
Sanctionable conduct
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
8
Share

Remember those lawyers who had to explain to a Southern District of New York judge why they relied on ChatGPT to find case law without double-checking to see if they were real?1 Well, last week, Judge Kastel published an order sanctioning the lawyers, which included the following punishment:

  • Mailing copies of the fake cases, the hearing transcript, the sanctions order, and supporting documents to their client and to each of the judges mentioned in the fake cases; and

  • Paying a penalty of $5,000

Most commentators immediately were struck by how mild this punishment was. I generally agree. Although I think the overall punishment was pretty severe if you take into account how much publicity and negative attention the lawyers received. Seems like that’s what Judge Kastel was thinking, too:

Anyways. The punishment is probably the least interesting thing about the sanctions order. To me, there were at least three other things this case revealed: (1) Misleading the court was the real problem; (2) Cutting corners is a reality of law practice; and (3) The law is inaccessible, even to lawyers.2

I’ll explain below.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Alex Su
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More